# 複数受けとられた方はご容赦ください.
皆様,
東北大学の松田です.
ICFP 2019併設の国際会議Haskell Symposium 2019(8/22-8/23@ベルリン)の
論文募集の案内を御送りいたします.
重要な日程は以下の通りです.
Early Track:
投稿〆切:3/15
採否通知:4/19
Regular Track and Demo:
投稿〆切:5/10
採否通知:6/21
会議:8/22-8/23
何卒投稿をご検討いただけますと幸いです.
CFPにあります通り,今年は軽量double blind reviewを採用しております.
投稿時はお気をつけください.
================================================================================
ACM SIGPLAN CALL FOR SUBMISSIONS
Haskell Symposium 2019
Berlin, Germany
22--23 August, 2019
http://www.haskell.org/haskell-symposium/2019/
================================================================================
The ACM SIGPLAN Haskell Symposium 2019 will be co-located with the 2019
International Conference on Functional Programming (ICFP).
**NEW THIS YEAR**: We will be using a lightweight double-blind reviewing
process. See further information below.
The Haskell Symposium presents original research on Haskell,
discusses practical experience and future development of the
language, and promotes other forms of declarative programming.
Topics of interest include:
* Language design, with a focus on possible extensions and modifications of
Haskell as well as critical discussions of the status quo;
* Theory, such as formal semantics of the present language or future
extensions, type systems, effects, metatheory, and foundations for
program analysis and transformation;
* Implementations, including program analysis and transformation,
static and dynamic compilation for sequential, parallel, and distributed
architectures, memory management, as well as foreign function and
component interfaces;
* Libraries, that demonstrate new ideas or techniques for functional
programming in Haskell;
* Tools, such as profilers, tracers, debuggers, preprocessors,
and testing tools;
* Applications, to scientific and symbolic computing, databases,
multimedia, telecommunication, the web, and so forth;
* Functional Pearls, being elegant and instructive programming examples;
* Experience Reports, to document general practice and experience in
education, industry, or other contexts;
* System Demonstrations, based on running software rather than novel
research results.
Regular papers should explain their research contributions in
both general and technical terms, identifying what has been
accomplished, explaining why it is significant, and relating it
to previous work, and to other languages where appropriate.
Experience reports and functional pearls need not necessarily
report original academic research results. For example, they may
instead report reusable programming idioms, elegant ways to
approach a problem, or practical experience that will be useful
to other users, implementers, or researchers. The key criterion
for such a paper is that it makes a contribution from which other
Haskellers can benefit. It is not enough simply to describe a
standard solution to a standard programming problem, or report on
experience where you used Haskell in the standard way and
achieved the result you were expecting.
System demonstrations should summarize the system capabilities
that would be demonstrated. The proposals will be judged on
whether the ensuing session is likely to be important and
interesting to the Haskell community at large, whether on grounds
academic or industrial, theoretical or practical, technical,
social or artistic. Please contact the program chair with any
questions about the relevance of a proposal.
Submission Details
==================
Early and Regular Track
-----------------------
The Haskell Symposium uses a two-track submission process so that
some papers can gain early feedback. Strong papers submitted to
the early track are accepted outright, and the others will be
given their reviews and invited to resubmit to the regular
track. Papers accepted via the early and regular tracks are
considered of equal value and will not be distinguished in the
proceedings. Although all papers may be submitted to the early
track, authors of functional pearls and experience reports are
particularly encouraged to use this mechanism. The success of
these papers depends heavily on the way they are presented, and
submitting early will give the program committee a chance to
provide feedback and help draw out the key ideas.
Formatting
----------
Submitted papers should be in portable document format (PDF),
formatted using the ACM SIGPLAN style guidelines. Authors should
use the `acmart` format, with the `sigplan` sub-format for ACM
proceedings. For details, see:
http://www.sigplan.org/Resources/Author/#acmart-format
It is recommended to use the `review` option when submitting a
paper; this option enables line numbers for easy reference in
reviews.
Functional pearls, experience reports, and demo proposals should be
labelled clearly as such.
Lightweight Double-blind Reviewing
----------------------------------
Haskell Symposium 2019 will use a lightweight double-blind
reviewing process. To facilitate this, submitted papers must
adhere to two rules:
1. Author names and institutions must be omitted, and
2. References to authors’ own related work should be in the third person
(e.g., not “We build on our previous work …” but rather
“We build on the work of …”).
The purpose of this process is to help the reviewers come to an
initial judgment about the paper without bias, not to make it
impossible for them to discover the authors if they were to
try. Nothing should be done in the name of anonymity that weakens
the submission or makes the job of reviewing the paper more
difficult (e.g., important background references should not be
omitted or anonymized). In addition, authors should feel free to
disseminate their ideas or draft versions of their paper as they
normally would. For instance, authors may post drafts of their
papers on the web or give talks on their research ideas.
A reviewer will learn the identity of the author(s) of a paper
after a review is submitted.
Page Limits
-----------
The length of submissions should not exceed the following limits:
Regular paper: 12 pages
Functional pearl: 12 pages
Experience report: 6 pages
Demo proposal: 2 pages
There is no requirement that all pages are used. For example, a
functional pearl may be much shorter than 12 pages. In all cases,
the list of references is not counted against these page limits.
Deadlines
---------
Early track:
Submission deadline: 15 March 2019 (Fri)
Notification: 19 April 2019 (Fri)
Regular track and demos:
Submission deadline: 10 May 2019 (Fri)
Notification: 21 June 2019 (Fri)
Camera-ready deadline for accepted papers:
30 June 2019 (Thu)
Deadlines are valid anywhere on Earth.
Submission
----------
Submissions must adhere to SIGPLAN's republication policy
(http://sigplan.org/Resources/Policies/Republication/), and authors
should be aware of ACM's policies on plagiarism
(https://www.acm.org/publications/policies/plagiarism).
The paper submission deadline and length limitations are firm.
There will be no extensions, and papers violating the length
limitations will be summarily rejected.
Papers should be submitted through HotCRP at:
https://haskell19.hotcrp.com/
Improved versions of a paper may be submitted at any point before
the submission deadline using the same web interface.
Supplementary material: Authors have the option to attach
supplementary material to a submission, on the understanding that
reviewers may choose not to look at it. This supplementary
material should not be submitted as part of the main document;
instead, it should be uploaded as a separate PDF document or
tarball.
Supplementary material should be uploaded at submission time, not
by providing a URL in the paper that points to an external
repository.
Authors are free to upload both anonymized and non-anonymized
supplementary material. Anonymized supplementary material will be
visible to reviewers immediately; non-anonymized supplementary
material will be revealed to reviewers only after they have
submitted their review of the paper and learned the identity of
the author(s).
Resubmitted Papers: Authors who submit a revised version of a
paper that has previously been rejected by another conference
have the option to attach an annotated copy of the reviews of
their previous submission(s), explaining how they have addressed
these previous reviews in the present submission. If a reviewer
identifies him/herself as a reviewer of this previous submission
and wishes to see how his/her comments have been addressed, the
principal editor will communicate to this reviewer the annotated
copy of his/her previous review. Otherwise, no reviewer will read
the annotated copies of the previous reviews.
Travel Support
==============
Student attendees with accepted papers can apply for a SIGPLAN
PAC grant to help cover travel expenses. PAC also offers other
support, such as for child-care expenses during the meeting or
for travel costs for companions of SIGPLAN members with physical
disabilities, as well as for travel from locations outside of
North America and Europe. For details on the PAC program, see its
web page (http://pac.sigplan.org).
Proceedings
===========
Accepted papers will be included in the ACM Digital
Library. Authors must grant ACM publication rights upon
acceptance (http://authors.acm.org/main.html). Authors are
encouraged to publish auxiliary material with their paper
(source code, test data, etc.); they retain copyright of
auxiliary material.
Accepted proposals for system demonstrations will be posted on the
symposium website but not formally published in the proceedings.
All accepted papers and proposals will be posted on the conference
website one week before the meeting.
Publication date: The official publication date of accepted papers is
the date the proceedings are made available in the ACM Digital
Library. This date may be up to two weeks prior to the first day of the
conference. The official publication date affects the deadline for any
patent filings related to published work.
Program Committee
=================
Ki-Yung Ahn Hannam University
Christiaan Baaij QBayLogic B.V.
José Manuel Calderón Trilla Galois, Inc
Benjamin Delaware Purdue University
Richard Eisenberg (chair) Bryn Mawr College
Jennifer Hackett University of Nottingham
Kazutaka Matsuda Tohoku University
Trevor McDonnell Utrecht University
Ivan Perez NIA / NASA Formal Methods
Nadia Polikarpova University of California, San Diego
Norman Ramsey Tufts University
Christine Rizkallah University of New South Wales
Eric Seidel Bloomberg LP
Alejandro Serrano Mena Utrecht University
John Wiegley Dfinity Foundation
Thomas Winant Well-Typed LLP
Ningning Xie University of Hong Kong
If you have questions, please contact the chair at: rae(a)cs.brynmawr.edu
================================================================================
皆様
2月26日(火)に行われます、ウィーン工科大学 Matthias Baaz 先生と
インスブルック大学 Cezary Kaliszyk 先生の講演のお知らせです。
皆様、どうぞ奮ってご参加ください。
廣川 直 (北陸先端科学技術大学院大学 情報科学系)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
* JAIST Logic Seminar Series *
Date: Feb 26 (Tue), 2019, 13:30 - 15:30
Place: I-56 (Collaboration Room 7) on 5F of IS Building III at JAIST
(Access: http://www.jaist.ac.jp/english/location/access.html)
-*- -*- -*- -*- -*- -*- -*- -*- -*-
Speaker: Matthias Baaz (Vienna University of Technology)
Title: On the benefit of unsound rules: Henkin quantifiers and beyond
Abstract:
We give examples of analytic sequent calculi LK+ and LK++ that extend
Gentzen's sequent calculus LK by unsound quantifier rules in such a
way that
i) derivations lead only to true sequents,
ii) cut free proofs may be non-elementary shorter than cut free LK proofs.
This research is based on properties of Hilbert's epsilon calculus
and is part of efforts to complement Hilbert's stepwise concept of
proof by useful global concepts. We use these ideas to provide analytic
calculi for Henkin quantifiers demonstrate soundness, (cut free)
completeness and cut elimination. Furthermore, we show, that in the
case of quantifier macros such as Henkin quantifiers for a partial
semantics global calculi are the only option to preserve analyticity.
-*- -*- -*- -*- -*- -*- -*- -*- -*-
Speaker: Cezary Kaliszyk (University of Innsbruck)
Title: Learning Theorem Proving from Scratch
Abstract:
Machine learning can in some domains find algorithms that are better
than human heuristics. In this talk we will look at various theorem
proving problems and their heuristics, and see which of those can be
replaces by machine learned strategies. Instead of typical brute-force
search, we will consider Monte-Carlo simulations guided by reinforcement
learning from previous proof attempts. Various predictors for estimating
the usefulness of proof steps and the likelihood of closing the open
tableaux branches will be compared.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
複数お受けとられた方はご容赦ください.
東北大学の松田です.
来たる6月4日に開催される双方向変換に関する国際ワークショップ Bx 2019 のご案内を御送りいたします.〆切等の日程は以下となっております.
アブストラクト〆切:2/12 (AoE)
論文〆切:2/19 (AoE)
採否通知:4/8
カメラレディ〆:5/1前後
〆切まで日数が近くギリギリの案内で恐縮ですが,
どうぞご投稿を検討いただければ幸いです.
Bx 2019: 8th International Workshop on Bidirectional Transformations
====================================================================
Highlights:
- workshop date set on June 4, 2019
- Zachary Ives confirmed as invited speaker
- abstract submission in two weeks (Tuesday, Feb 12, AoE)
- links to CEUR-WS.org style and template files updated
* http://bx-community.wikidot.com/bx2019:home
* June 4, 2019, Saint Joseph’s University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
* as part of Philadelphia Logic Week (PLW) 2019: https://sites.sju.edu/plw/
* Invited speaker: Zachary Ives (University of Pennsylvania)
Bidirectional transformations (bx) are a mechanism for maintaining the
consistency of at least two related sources of information. Such
sources can be relational databases, software models and code, or any
other document following standard or ad-hoc formats. Bx are an
emerging topic in a wide range of research areas, with prominent
presence at top conferences in several different fields (namely
databases, programming languages, software engineering, and graph
transformation), but with results in one field often getting limited
exposure in the others. Bx 2019 is a dedicated venue for bx in all
relevant fields, and is part of a workshop series that was created in
order to promote cross-disciplinary research and awareness in the
area. As such, since its beginning in 2012, the workshop has rotated
between venues in different fields.
Bx 2019 will be a part of Philadelphia Logic Week (PLW) 2019, which
also includes conference and workshops on logic, provenance, and
databases, topics that we hope will complement Bx and help build
engagement with these communities.
Important Dates
===============
- Abstract submission: Feb 12 (AoE)
- Paper submission: Feb 19 (AoE)
- Author notification: Apr 8
- Camera-ready: around May 1
- Workshop: Jun 4, 2019
Aims and Topics
===============
The aim of the workshop is to bring together researchers and
practitioners, established and new, interested in bx from different
perspectives, including but not limited to:
- bidirectional programming languages and frameworks
- data and model synchronization
- view updating
- inter-model consistency analysis and repair
- data/schema (or model/metamodel) co-evolution
- coupled software/model transformations
- inversion of transformations and data exchange mappings
- domain-specific languages for bx
- analysis and classification of requirements for bx
- bridging the gap between formal concepts and application scenarios
- analysis of efficiency of transformation algorithms and benchmarks
- survey and comparison of bx technologies
- case studies and tool support
Submission Guidelines
=====================
Papers must follow the CEUR-WS.org one-column style (with page
numbers) available at
- http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-XXX/samplestyles/onecolpceurws.sty
and must be submitted via EasyChair:
- https://www.easychair.org/conferences/?conf=bx2019
A sample LaTeX file using the above style (along with an included
sample image) can be downloaded at
- http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-XXX/samplestyles/paper1p.tex
- http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-XXX/samplestyles/fig1.eps
Five categories of submissions are considered:
* Full Research Papers (up to 15 pages)
- in-depth presentations of novel concepts and results
- applications of bx to new domains
- survey papers providing novel comparisons between existing bx
technologies and approaches case studies
* Tool Papers (up to 8 pages)
- guideline papers presenting best practices for employing a specific
bx approach (with a specific tool)
- presentation of new tools or substantial improvements to existing ones
- qualitative and/or quantitative comparisons of applying different bx
approaches and tools
* Experience Report (up to 8 pages)
- sharing experiences and lessons learned with bx tools/frameworks/languages
- how bx is used in (research/industrial/educational) projects
* Extended Abstracts and Short Papers (up to 4 pages)
- work in progress
- small focused contributions
- position papers and research perspectives
- critical questions and challenges for bx
* Talk Proposals (up to 2 pages)
- proposed lectures about topics of interest for bx
- existing work representing relevant contributions for bx
- promising contributions that are not mature enough to be proposed as
papers of the other categories
If your submission is not a Full Research Paper, please include the
intended submission category in the Title field of EasyChair’s
submission form.
The bibliography is excluded from the page limits. All papers are
expected to be self-contained and well-written. Tool papers are not
expected to present novel scientific results, but to document
artifacts of interest and share bx experience/best practices with the
community. Experience papers are expected to report on lessons learnt
from applying bx approaches, languages, tools, and theories to
practical application case studies. Extended abstracts should
primarily provoke interesting discussion at the workshop and will not
be held to the same standard of maturity as regular papers; short
papers contain focused results, positions or perspectives that can be
presented in full in just a few pages, and that correspondingly
contain fewer results and that therefore might not be competitive in
the full paper category. Talk proposals are expected to present work
that is of particular interest to the community and worth a talk slot
at the workshop.
We strongly encourage authors to ensure that any (variants of)
examples are present in the bx example repository at the time of
submission, and for tool papers, to allow for reproducibility with
minimal effort, either via a virtual machine (e.g., via Share -
http://share20.eu) or a dedicated website with relevant artifacts and
tool access.
All papers will be peer-reviewed by at least three members of the
program committee.
If a paper is accepted, one author of the paper is expected to
participate in the workshop to present it. Authors of accepted tool
papers are also expected to be available to demonstrate their tool at
the event.
Proceedings and Special Issue
=============================
The workshop proceedings, including all accepted papers (except talk
proposals), will be published electronically by CEUR-WS.org. A special
issue open to all authors of papers in BX workshops over the past few
years is planned.
Program committee
=================
* Co-chairs
- James Cheney, University of Edinburgh, UK
- Hsiang-Shang ‘Josh’ Ko, National Institute of Informatics, Japan
* Members
- Leopoldo Bertossi, Carleton University, Canada
- Ravi Chugh, University of Chicago, US
- Zinovy Diskin, McMaster University, Canada
- Paolo Guagliardo, University of Edinburgh, UK
- Jules Hedges, University of Oxford, UK
- Michael Johnson, Macquarie University, Australia
- Leen Lambers, Hasso Plattner Institute, University of Potsdam, Germany
- Kazutaka Matsuda, Tohoku University, Japan
- Anders Miltner, Princeton University, US
- Alfonso Pierantonio, University of L'Aquila, Italy
- Perdita Stevens, University of Edinburgh, UK
- Daniel Strüber, University of Koblenz and Landau, Germany
- Manuel Wimmer, Vienna University of Technology, Austria
- Nicolas Wu, University of Bristol, UK
皆様
LMUミュンヘンのHelmut Schwichtenberg先生の講演のお知らせです。
どうぞふるってご参加ください。
問合せ先:
石原 哉
北陸先端科学技術大学院大学 情報科学系
e-mail: ishihara(a)jaist.ac.jp
-----------------------------------------------
* JAIST Logic Seminar Series *
* The seminar below is held as a part of JSPS Core-to-Core Program,
A. Advanced Research Networks and EU Horizon 2020
Marie Skłodowska-Curie actions RISE project CID
(http://www.jaist.ac.jp/logic/ja/core2core, http://cid.uni-trier.de/).
Date: Wednesday 6 March, 2019, 15:20-17:00
Place: JAIST, Collaboration room 7 (I-56)
(Access: http://www.jaist.ac.jp/english/location/access.html)
Speaker: Professor Helmut Schwichtenberg (Mathematisches Institut, LMU
Muenchen)
Title: Equality and extensionality
Abstract:
We sketch a theory of computable functionals (TCF) based on
finitary algebras given by their constructors. Its intended semantics
admits non-total functionals. For closed algebras of level zero we
allow infinite stream-like objects. For higher types we define
(pointwise) equality as a logical relation, and extensionality by
diagonalization of equality. We define realizability and -- in the
spirit of Kolmogorov (1932) -- add an invariance axiom: every
computationally relevant (c.r.) formula A is equivalent to the
existence of an extensional realizer of A. Then we can prove (ordinary
and dependent) choice, and also a soundness theorem stating that the
computational content extracted from a proof of a c.r. formula A
realizes A.