次の集会のご案内をさせていただきます。 岡田光弘（慶応大学哲学専攻） ―――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――
国際ワークショップ (International Workshop) Philosophy of Logic and Speach Act Theory 論理と言語行為論の哲学
――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――― 開催日時：2013年10月5日(土) 13:30PM-17:00PM (17:30からレセプション有り。 出席者無料) Date: October 5, 2013 (Sat) 13:30PM-17:30 PM 開催場所：慶應義塾大学三田キャンパス南館（法科大学院棟) 地下4階ディスタンスラーニング室 Place: Distance Learning Room, B4F (Basemant) of South building (Law school building), Mita campus of Keio University. http://www.keio.ac.jp/en/maps/mita.html ―――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――
論理と言語行為論の哲学についての国際集会を開催します。 特に今回はフランスＣＮＲＳ人文社会部門及びパリ大学ソルボンヌ＝パンテオン 校(パリ大学第1校）哲学科との共同企画で 講演および討論集会を行います。
- 提題講演者： Sandra Laugier (Universite Paris I, 哲学科教授) Pierre Wagner (Universite Paris I, 哲学科教授)
- ディスカッションコーディネータ 岡田光弘（慶應義塾大学哲学専攻） ＊発表言語は英語
- 参加方法： 事前登録不要・参加費無料 (※セッション終了後の立食形式レセプションも参加自由です)
Ｌａｕｈｉｅｒ教授は言語行為論、ウィトゲンシュタインの哲学などを専門とさ れ多くの著編著を出版されています。 Ｗａｇｎｅｒ教授は論理の哲学、数学の哲学を専門とされ、クセジュ文庫の Logiqueなど多くの著作で知られています。
.Program (13:30PM,-!7:30PM) 1. Pierre Wagner (Professor, Department of Philosophy, Universite Paris I (Sorbonne) Pluralism and Universalism in Logic
Discussion Pause
2.Sandra Laugier (Professor, Department of Philosophy, Universite Paris I (Sorbonne) The normality of the Ordinary, Performative Utterances and Social Reality: Reconsideration of Speach Act Theory of Austin
Discussion -- 17:30PM- Reception (free of charge for all participants)
簡単な要旨を下に付けています。 ――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――― 主催・企画：慶應義塾大学 「思考と行動判断」 の研究拠点 共同企画： ＣＮＲＳ人文社会学部門 お問い合わせ先： E-mail: [email protected] ---------------------------------------
1. Pluralism and Universalism in Logic Pierre Wagner
論理のPluralismとＵｎｉｖｅｒｓａｌｉｓｍの考え方とその問題点などを検討 します。また、近年の論理学におけるこれに関係する 動きについても議論します。例えば様々な部分構造論理や様相論理、動的論理系 論理について論理的多元論の立場でとらえる考え方と そうでない立場でとらえる考え方について検討します。最近のの Ｕｎｉｖｅｒｓａｌ logicの運動についても批判的観点も含めて議論します。
2. The normativity of the Ordinary -Performative Utterrances and Social Reality
The question of performative utterances seems inseparable from a reflection on social normativity, especially on the transgression of norms implied in Austin’s thorough study of the failures (abuses and misfires) of the performative, in /How to do things with words/. Austin’s discovery of speech acts rests ultimately on thought about law and normativity. It is a well known fact that H. L. A. Hart was a member of the seminar, held just after the war, in which Austin presented the theory of speech acts. Moreover, Reinach’s theory of social acts, an early form of the theory of speech acts, was developed in a legal context. Reinach’s work anticipates Austin’s so closely that some historians of speech act theory have proposed that Austin was aware, /via/ Ryle, of Reinach’s work.
The connection between law and speech acts has engendered all sorts of difficulties and misunderstandings, especially with respect to the normativity of these acts and with respect to the existence of norms or rules grounding them (cf. Hart and Searle). My aim here is, first of all, to clarify the connection between speech acts, normativity, and law. This large question has often been taken up in order to make normative use of Austin’s theories, for example by Searle. It is therefore important to see what use can really be made of Austin’s work in the theory of norms. I will first approach this issue by examining the specific nature of the speech act in Austin. Reflection on law makes clear the variety of speech acts beyond the paradigmatic example of promising. It also shows what is truly at stake in Austin’s theory. Furthermore it alerts us to the full radicalism of Austin’s philosophy of language. In making performatives “social” acts determined by rules, Austin’s mainstream interpreters and inheritors neglect the properly linguistic dimension of Austin’s discovery. They also miss his critique of representationalism and of the very idea of states of affairs. Yet this critique is inseparable from his discovery of performatives. What is at stake, therefore, is the very idea of performance, that is to say, the very idea of agency, independently of all prior normativity and of any creation of a state of affairs or a social reality.
-------------------------------------end of the announcement---------------------------